Anthis v. Drew
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PINKHAM, C.
This action was instituted by C. H. Drew and others against Willard Morrow and others in the district court of Creek county for partition of 160 acres of land allotted to one Tom Fish, deceased, and an accounting for rents and profits, the said plaintiffs claiming that they were maternal heirs of said Tom Fish and as such entitled to a one-half interest in said estate. Subsequently, the interven-ers, Lilah Tiger and others, filed their petition of intervention, alleging that they were the paternal heirs of Tom Fish and- claiming interests against-the contentions or both…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fry's Election CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- State ex rel. Phelps v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Moore v. HayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Richards v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Geb v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Merrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.