Legal Opinion

Anthis v. Drew

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1925No. 15435PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

PINKHAM, C.

This action was instituted by C. H. Drew and others against Willard Morrow and others in the district court of Creek county for partition of 160 acres of land allotted to one Tom Fish, deceased, and an accounting for rents and profits, the said plaintiffs claiming that they were maternal heirs of said Tom Fish and as such entitled to a one-half interest in said estate. Subsequently, the interven-ers, Lilah Tiger and others, filed their petition of intervention, alleging that they were the paternal heirs of Tom Fish and- claiming interests against-the contentions or both…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fry's Election CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
  2. Sandlin v. BarkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. State ex rel. Phelps v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Moore v. HayesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Richards v. HuffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Geb v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Merrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API