Legal Opinion

Whaley v. Holt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 9, 1964No. 40705PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Judge.

By admission of counsel for the plaintiff in error the petition in this case does not sound in contract but rests upon the tort of fraud and deceit.

“In Georgia the essential elements of a cause of action for the common-law tort of deceit based upon fraud have been stated to be: . . . (4) the speaker’s knowledge of its falsity or ignorance of its truth; . . .” Doanes v. Nalley Chevrolet, Inc., 105 Ga. App. 846, 847 (1) (125 SE2d 717); Daugert v. Holland Furnace Co., 107 Ga. App. 566, 569 (130 SE2d 763); Snow’s Laundry &c. Co. v. Ga. Power Co., 61 Ga. App. 402, 405 (6 SE2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daugert v. Holland Furnace CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Snow's Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Doanes v. Nalley Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Hillinghorst v. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lively v. GarnickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Bazemore v. BurnetCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  3. Randall v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Preiser v. Jim Letts Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  5. Strother Ford, Inc. v. BullockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API