Legal Opinion

People v. Nazzaro

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 1963No. Crim. 8833PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

In a prosecution for the crime of robbery, the defendant was found guilty by a jury of robbery of the second degree. He has appealed from the judgment and has attempted to appeal from the nonappealable order denying his motion for a new trial. A statement will be made of the evidence in the light of which his contentions must be considered.

Eva Dunlap testified that she worked as a clerk at the Monrovia Bakery. On June 19, 1962, the defendant entered the bakery about 2:30 p.m. He leaned over the counter and said, “Lady, I want money.” He was holding a bag against the counter. Out of the bag he…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. AlbertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. People v. CoefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. QuielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. BeverlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. AsherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. Van PhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API