Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Lunsford

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 29, 1932No. 21748PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

Missouri Lunsford and Alice Lunsford brought suit against Henry Burnett, as administrator of the estate of W. M. Holloway, for the recovery of a certain sum of money, and for the proceeds of the sale of certain household effects and parcels of real estate, and for general relief. By amendment the petitioners aban*169cloned all claim to the proceeds of the real estate, and limited the suit to the recovery of $683. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the petitioners for the sum demanded. Exceptions pendente lite were taken to the judgments overruling the objection to the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. AnglinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Miller v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Central of Georgia Ry. Co. v. Banks & FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. City of Albany v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  5. Macon & Birmingham Railway Co. v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  2. Young v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. Housing Authority v. Savannah Iron & Wire Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Young v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API