Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Magee

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Henderson county; the Hon. Akthtjk A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice LawkeNce

This was an action brought by the appellee to recover the value of a horse killed by one of defendant’s trains. The declaration has but one count, and in that the plaintiff avers a failure to build and maintain a sufficient fence, as required by the statute, and also avers that the defendant so carelessly ran, conducted and directed its train that it struck and killed the plaintiff’s horse.

On the trial the plaintiff was permitted to introduce evidence tending to prove both the grounds of liability alleged in his declaration; and the court instructed, a recovery could be had upon either…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Military Tract Railroad v. RockafellowIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Illinois Central Railroad v. SwearingenIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ebsery v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Urban v. Pere Marquette RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  3. S. S. Sleeper & Co. v. World's Fair Banquet Hall Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. ProbeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
  5. East St. Louis Connecting Ry. Co. v. ReamesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API