Legal Opinion

East St. Louis Connecting Ry. Co. v. Reames

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 1, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. Alonzo S. Wilderman. Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Worthington

The declaration avers that the appellant was operating a railroad in the city of East St. Louis, and that an ordinance in the city required all freight locomotives and cars to be run at a speed not to exceed six miles an hour, and that the bell should be ringing constantly while running on any track within the city limits; that plaintiff was passing over Front street in the said city, with due care and diligence, and that defendant, without ringing the bell or sounding the whistle, negligently and wantonly ran and drove said locomotive against plaintiff with great force, at a high and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. East St. Louis Connecting Railway Co. v. O'HaraIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MageeIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flood v. BitzerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1942
  2. Guianios v. DeCamp Coal Mining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API