Legal Opinion

Monacelli v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1945No. Claim No. 26035Published

1Per curiam

Due to the improper construction and negligent maintenance of the banks and bottom of the Barge Canal, water seeped through and accumulated on the so-called Otto-Squires property. The State appropriated on that property an easement for floodage and seepage purposes, excepting from said appropriation all rights, titles, interest and uses save the perpetual easement to overflow and flood the described lands, by seepage and leakage. Included in the rights, titles, interest and uses so excepted, was the right of the owner of the Otto-Squires property and those claiming under him to use that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. . SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Briske v. Village of BurnhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Cook v. Champlain Transportation Co.Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  5. Fero v. . the Buffalo and State Line Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API