Legal Opinion

Wofford v. Davis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 18, 1988No. 61424PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Vice Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs, Rosana and Errol Wof-ford, brought this action against Elaine Neill Davis, M.D., alleging a negligently performed sterilization procedure resulted in the birth of a healthy but unwanted baby. Plaintiffs sought damages rising from negligence and breach of an oral contract, seeking recovery of medical expenses for the mother and child, as well as the cost of raising the child and compensation for emotional and mental anguish.

The defendant filed a motion to strike and special demurrer. In ruling on these motions the trial court eliminated the claim…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Morris v. SanchezSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Goforth v. Porter Medical Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shull v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Chaffee v. SeslarIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Mowles Ex Rel. Mowles v. Hillcrest Health CenterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Chaffee v. SeslarIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Shull v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API