Legal Opinion

Swafford v. Vermillion

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 15, 1953No. 35688PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Undisputed facts, forming the background of the present action, as disclosed at its trial, are as hereinafter related.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, has for a number of years operated an automobile loan business in Tulsa, Oklahoma. In recent years she acquired a used car business there. In 1947, she employed Jim Colvin, with whom she had been personally acquainted for several years previously, as a salesman in the used car business. This business shared a used car lot with another dealer named Doll. Colvin was paid regular commissions on cars he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Collyer v. S. H. Kress & Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cochran v. ToherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  3. S. H. Kress & Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Gray v. AbboudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Thompson v. Galion Iron Works & Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Allied Hotels, Ltd. v. BardenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Peoples Bank of Aurora v. HaarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Holmes v. NesterArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Gerks v. DeatheDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993
  5. J. C. Penney Company, a Corporation v. Leonard O'Daniell and Opal O'daniell, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API