Legal Opinion
Brannan Sand & Gravel Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 1996No. 94CA1834PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROY.
In this proceeding, plaintiff, Brannan Sand & Gravel Company, seeks to recover for labor and materials supplied for the installation of curb and gutter and the paving of streets in a new subdivision annexed, or to be annexed, to the City of Westminster (the City). In its complaint, plaintiff alleged four claims for relief: (1) a contract claim against the developer, Designer Properties, Inc. (developer); (2) a quasi-contract claim against a significant number of interest holders in the subdivision, including the City, which owns the public rights-of-way; (3) a claim to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Colorado v. SharpSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Westminster v. Brannan Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- Compass Bank v. Brickman Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
- Compass Bank v. Brickman Group, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005