Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rosado v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 1984Published

1Dissent

Kassal, J. (dissenting).

I disagree with the majority and would modify to deny the motion to dismiss the second cause of action in the third-party complaint for indemnity and remand the third-party action for trial on that cause. In my view, principles of equity and fairness warrant upholding a claim for indemnity under the facts of this case.

The issue is whether a manufacturer may obtain indemnification from the purchaser where, as here, the purchaser had agreed to be responsible for complying with local laws, did assemble and complete the product and, allegedly, the manner by which the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Cover v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Levine v. Shell Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API