Parker v. Bruner
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
Based upon a claim of seduction, plaintiff received a verdict for twenty-five thousand dollars actual damages and fifty thousand dollars punitive damages. Judgment was entered accordingly and defendant appeals.
We first mention defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because the action of seduction violates his constitutional rights. This point is set out in full below.1 This contention was first raised in defendant’s after trial motions.
To raise and preserve a federal or state constitutional question…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- City of Town & Country v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Kansas City v. HoweMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Crawford v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
- Matter of Estate of MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Felton v. HulserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Parker v. BrunerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985