Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 14, 1998No. 21196-3-IIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, C.J.

— Daniel James Miller was charged with two counts of burglary in the second degree. Count I alleged that Miller “did enter or remain unlawfully in a building . . . located at 509 N. Rock, Centraba, to wit: an apartment building.” Count II alleged entry into the same address but stated, “to wit: a storage unit.” Miller appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in ruhng that the storage unit was a “building” as defined by RCW 9A.04.110(5) and in denying his motion to dismiss Count II. We hold that the storage locker he entered was a “building” and therefore, affirm.

FACTS

Martin Fryer, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ChapinWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  4. State v. DeitchlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. State v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BonisisioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API