State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, C.J.
— Daniel James Miller was charged with two counts of burglary in the second degree. Count I alleged that Miller “did enter or remain unlawfully in a building . . . located at 509 N. Rock, Centraba, to wit: an apartment building.” Count II alleged entry into the same address but stated, “to wit: a storage unit.” Miller appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in ruhng that the storage unit was a “building” as defined by RCW 9A.04.110(5) and in denying his motion to dismiss Count II. We hold that the storage locker he entered was a “building” and therefore, affirm.
FACTS
Martin Fryer, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ChapinWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. DeitchlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BonisisioCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.