State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, C.J.
¶1 — Ronald Johnson appeals his conviction for second degree burglary, arguing that because the garage he unlawfully entered was missing its overhead door it is not a building as that term is used in the statutory definition of burglary. Because the statutory definition of a building is broad enough to include the garage in this case and the State presented sufficient evidence to allow a rational jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the garage belonging to Andria Simcoe and her husband is a building, we affirm Johnson’s conviction.
FACTS
¶2 On September 16, 2003, Simcoe saw a man she did…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. BobenhouseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. BobenhouseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.