Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 7, 2006No. 31830-0-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn-Brintnall, C.J.

¶1 — Ronald Johnson appeals his conviction for second degree burglary, arguing that because the garage he unlawfully entered was missing its overhead door it is not a building as that term is used in the statutory definition of burglary. Because the statutory definition of a building is broad enough to include the garage in this case and the State presented sufficient evidence to allow a rational jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that the garage belonging to Andria Simcoe and her husband is a building, we affirm Johnson’s conviction.

FACTS

¶2 On September 16, 2003, Simcoe saw a man she did…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Roscoe v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. State v. WentzWashington Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. BobenhouseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. State v. BobenhouseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API