Legal Opinion

Fox v. Doll

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1950No. 19397PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REGAN, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. William T. Fox, the vendees, brought this suit for $400.00 or double the amount of a deposit made on account of the purchase price of certain real estate, against the defendants, Warren A. Doll and Emile M. Doll, the vendors.

Defendants answered and admitted that $200.00 was deposited with them on account of the purchase price of certain real estate, but denied that plaintiffs were entitled to a judgment for double the amount of the deposit. Defendants further answered in reconvention by praying for specific performance of the agreement to purchase the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Murphy v. HusseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Kinberger v. DrouetSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  3. Jaenke v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Legier v. BraughnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Kinder v. ScharffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. VivesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Haeuser v. CastrogiovanniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958
  3. Haeuser v. CastrogiovanniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API