Tori Belle Cosmetics LLC v. Meek
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 TORI BELLE COSMETICS, LLC, Cause No. C21-0066RSL 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN 9 v. PART MOTION TO DISMISS 10 COUNTERCLAIMS NATALIE MEEK, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on “Counterclaim-Defendants Tori Belle Cosmetics, 14 15 LLC and Laura Hunter’s Motion to Dismiss Natalie Meek’s Counterclaims.” Dkt. # 84. The 16 question for the Court on a motion to dismiss is whether the facts alleged in the pleading 17 sufficiently state a “plausible” ground for relief. Bell Atl. Corp. v.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.