Legal Opinion

In the Interest of A.J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STEVENS, P.J.:

D.J., Maternal Grandmother (“Grandmother”), appeals from the trial court’s orders entered on November 18, 2010, denying Grandmother’s petitions for special relief filed November 11, 2010, seeking standing “in custody and CYF matters” for her three minor grandchildren, Arm.J., Ari.J., and A’S.J. (collectively “Children”). We affirm.

The relevant facts and procedure underlying this appeal are as follows: Arm.J., a male child born in March of 2003, Ari.J., a female child born in March of 2003, and A’S.J., a male child born in January of 2004, are the minor Children of S.J.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. RM v. Baxter Ex Rel. TMSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. In re L.J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. In the Interest of L.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. In re D.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. In re D.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API