Legal Opinion

Southern Ry. Co. v. Mauck

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 27, 1913PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court. ('Common Pleas Branch, Second Division.)

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

In a suit to recover damages for personal injuries the appellee, Mauck, was awarded $500. Insisting that a verdict in its favor should 'have been directed by the trial court, the appellant company prosecutes this appeal and asks a reversal of the judgment because its request was refused.

At the time he was injured appellee was an inexperienced boy between seventeen and eighteen years of age. He was employed as a section hand, and at the time of the accident the crew in which he was engaged was pushing with a ¡handcar a small flat car, loaded with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Chess & Wymond Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Gaines & Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Flaig v. Andrews Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Bollington v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neil v. West Virginia Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rogers Administrator v. Kosmos Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Mannin v. Ashland Iron & Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Payne v. Henry's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API