Legal Opinion

In Re Factor VIII or IX Concentrate Blood Products Liability Litigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 14, 2009No. MDL No. 986. No. 93 C 7452Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

(Ruling on Taiwan Forum Non Conveniens Motion)

JOHN F. GRADY, District Judge.

This multidistrict litigation consists of claims against the defendant pharmaceutical companies by citizens of various foreign countries who suffer from hemophilia. The plaintiffs allege that they contracted the HIV and/or Hepatitis C(HCV) viruses from using contaminated blood products manufactured by one or more of the defendants. The products were derived by the defendants from the plasma of paid blood donors and processed by the defendants into blood-clotting “factor concentrates” which…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Kontoulas v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States Liability Insurance v. Haidinger-Hayes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API