Legal Opinion

People v. Whaley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2007No. H030167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*971Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, Acting P. J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant George L. Whaley appeals from an order of the trial court recommitting him to the Department of Mental Health for a period of two years under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (SVPA). (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.)1

Whaley contends that the trial court erred in giving a supplemental jury instruction to the deadlocked jury that exerted undue pressure on the holdout juror, in violation of the rule established in People v. Gainer (1977) 19 Cal.3d 835, 850 [139 Cal.Rptr. 861, 566 P.2d 997] (Gainer) that the minority jurors…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. PeoplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. WhaleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. In Re FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. People v. SantiagoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. People v. Escamilla CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API