Legal Opinion
Nongard v. Burlington County Bridge Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 3, 1956No. 11733PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTIE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action, appellants here, are a Chicago brokerage and trading firm, Ketcham & Nongard, and the three individuals who are its members. They have sued Burlington County Bridge Commission, a corporate public agency of the State of New Jersey, and David Connelly and William Wells, receivers appointed by the Superior Court of New Jersey to collect from these plaintiffs and others personal money judgments entered against them in the case of Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co., 1950, 10 N.J.Super. 545, 77 A.2d 255, modified on appeal, 1952, 8 N.J.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Driscoll v. Burlington-Bristol Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. v. LauerDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1959
- Nongard v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956