Legal Opinion
Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Richman Bros.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 4, 1955No. 173PublishedCited by 275 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
In Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 348 U. S. 468, decided last Monday on writ of certiorari to the Missouri Supreme Court, we considered the jurisdiction of a state court to enjoin conduct which in one aspect brought it within exclusive federal authority under the Taft-Hartley Act and in another constituted a violation of a state statute against restraint of trade. In this case we have to decide the question whether, under similar circumstances, a union has open to it, without resorting to the appellate procedures of the State and eventually of this Court, jurisdiction of a federal district…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Toucey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Amalgamated Utility Workers v. Consolidated Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by275 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mitchum v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chick Kam Choo v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.