Watterson v. Fuellhart
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 14, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Warren Co., Sept. T., 1895, No. 18, on verdict for defendant. Assumpsit on a claim property bond.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 14, Jan. T., 1895, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Warren Co., Sept. T., 1895, No. 18, on verdict for defendant. Assumpsit on a claim property bond. Before Noyes, P. J. The material portion of the bond.in suit was as follows : “Whereas, a writ of replevin, wherein A. Y. D. Watterson, admr. est. of H. T. Knake dec’d is plaintiff and W. H. Thompson is defendant, hath issued out of the court of common pleas, in and for the count}» of Warren, and is made returnable on the first Monday of September next for 1 piano, of the price of six hundred dollars, which the said W. H.…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
On May 26, 1891, H. T. Knake, plaintiff’s intestate, issued a writ of replevin against one W. H. Thompson for a piano valued at $600. The writ was placed in the hands of defendant, sheriff Henry Fuellhart who, on the second day afterwards, served it on Thompson, who gave to the sheriff a claim property bond, with two sureties, in penal sum of $1,200, and retained possession of the piano. Thompson then entered appearance and plea, and on 25th of February, 1892, after trial, plaintiff got a verdict for $550, upon which judgment was entered. Upon this, *620he issued…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Balsley v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1850
- Myers v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
- Commonwealth v. ReesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
3Cited by7 opinions
- National City Bank v. KirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
- Schuette v. SwankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Commonwealth v. LenhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
- Automobile Securities Co. v. SwisshelmSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.