Legal Opinion

Automatic Canteen Co. Of America v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 3, 1952No. 10239_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

^KERNER, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner is engaged in the two-fold business of developing and leasing automatic vending machines and in the purchase of candy, gum, nuts and other confectionery products for resale to its distributors who in turn distribute them to the public by means of the vending machines. It seeks review of an'order of the Federal Trade Commission directing it to cease and desist from certain discriminatory practices related to 'both aspects of its business. The Federal Trade Commission, by cross petition, seeks affirmance and enforcement of the order.

The complaint was in two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Anniston Manufacturing Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Automatic Canteen Co. Of America v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  4. Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Simplicity Pattern Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API