Legal Opinion
United States v. United Bonding Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1970No. 28014PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS R. MORGAN, Circuit Judge:
This is an appeal by Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company from the ruling of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida that garnishment may be had against Michigan Millers Mutual, garnishee-appellant, by United Bonding Insurance Company, garnisher-appellee, which was a third-party beneficiary to an “Errors and Omissions Insurance Policy” issued to H. E. Goodman Insurance Agency by Michigan Millers Mutual.
H. E. Goodman Insurance Agency was a former agent of United Bonding. Acting on behalf of United Bonding, Goodman Insurance…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shingleton v. BusseySupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Tiedtke v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New YorkSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- American Fire and Casualty Company v. ColluraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fortune v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
- AXA XL INSURANCE COMPANY UK LIMITED, et al. v. GARY MCPHERSON as Personal Representative of the ESTATE of VIRGINIA MCPHERSON, et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- AXA XL Insurance Company UK Limited, et al. v. GARY MCPHERSON as Personal Representative of the ESTATE of VIRGINIA MCPHERSON, et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- United States v. United Bonding Insurance Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. H. E. Goodman Insurance Agency, Third-Party v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company, Garnishee-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970