White Studio, Inc. v. Dreyfoos
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Alexander W. Dreyfoos and' another, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 24th day of March, 1913, granting the plaintiff’s motion for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
Clarke, J.:
Plaintiff is a corporation. Its business is that. of making original photographs. It uses the name “ White ” as a trade ñame. Defendants áre copartners doing business under- the *763name Apeda Studio. Their chief business is that of manifold reproduction of photographs, and in the theatrical trade their name “ Apeda ” has become almost synonymous with photographic reproduction.
Plaintiff’s claim is that the defendants have reproduced plaintiff’s work in large quantities, and sold such reproductions at a less rate than it charges. It claims that it was being unfairly competed with. The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Roberson v. . Rochester Folding Box Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lumiere v. Robertson-Cole Distributing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Holmes v. Underwood & Underwood, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Hochstadter v. H. Tarr, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
- Lawrence v. YllaNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Alexandre v. Westchester Newspapers, Inc.Mount Vernon City Court · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.