Legal Opinion

Hochstadter v. H. Tarr, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 6, 1947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.

The question involved on this appeal is whether, in the absence of an agreement on the subject, negatives belonged to the customer or to the photographer.

The plaintiffs brought this action in replevin to recover five negatives of certain photographs taken of them by the defendant, a professional photographer. The photographs were taken for an agreed price, were delivered and the bill was paid. Plaintiffs then demanded delivery of the negatives whose value was proved as merely nominal. The court below decided that the negatives belonged to the customer and granted judgment against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corliss v. E. W. Walker Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1894
  2. White Studio, Inc. v. DreyfoosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Holmes v. Underwood & Underwood, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
  2. Western Photo & Supply Co. v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Universal Map Co. v. Lutz & SheinkmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
  4. Asch v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Asch v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API