Legal Opinion

Webster v. Sterling Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 7, 1943No. 38451PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OSDOL, C.

—

This case has been'before this court heretofore. See Webster v. Sterling Finance Co. et al. (Mo. Sup.), 165 S. W. (2d) 688, wherein the former appeal was dismissed as premature, no action having then been taken in the trial court regarding Octozone Equipment Company, a defendant. Subsequently plaintiff dismissed as to that defendant, and has again appealed.

The statement of the case made by this court on the former appeal is adopted with some modifications necessary since the cause may now be more fully 'reviewed.

Plaintiff, by his second amended petition containing twelve…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Clifford Banking Co. v. Donovan Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. White v. ScarrittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Burnett v. CrandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Hall v. MarstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1822
  5. Third National Bank v. St. Charles Savings BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Stith v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Investors Title Co., Inc. v. HammondsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Fish v. FishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. Clayton Brokerage Co. of St. Louis v. PillaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Ladue Contracting Co. v. Land Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1960

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API