Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fowler v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1970No. Appeal, 356Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Jacobs, J.:

I respectfully dissent because I feel that the court below correctly analyzed the facts and properly applied our case law in granting judgment n.o.v.

To the facts as stated by the majority I would add the following: The collision occurred at about 1:45 p.m. *250on a clear and sunny day. The roadway was dry. Appellant testified that appellee was moving at approximately 20 miles per hour after the impact.

A jury returned a verdict for the appellant. Appellee moved for judgment n.o.v. on the ground that appellant was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Smith v. United News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Ratcliff v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Sargeant v. AyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API