Fowler v. Smith
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Jacobs, J.:
I respectfully dissent because I feel that the court below correctly analyzed the facts and properly applied our case law in granting judgment n.o.v.
To the facts as stated by the majority I would add the following: The collision occurred at about 1:45 p.m. *250on a clear and sunny day. The roadway was dry. Appellant testified that appellee was moving at approximately 20 miles per hour after the impact.
A jury returned a verdict for the appellant. Appellee moved for judgment n.o.v. on the ground that appellant was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Topelski v. Universal South Side Autos, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Lewis v. QuinnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Smith v. United News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Ratcliff v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Sargeant v. AyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.