Hilliard v. Amoco Production Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
ItSAUNDERS, Judge.
These two suits were instituted on behalf of plaintiffs who are the land owners within the confines of the P.L. Lawrence No. 2 Well. The plaintiffs, who are the mineral interest owners in this production unit, have sued the defendant, Amoco 12Production Company, for interest, double royalties, and attorney’s fees due to the alleged unreasonable delay in the payment of royalties.
FACTS
In the latter part of 1987, the defendant, Amoco Production Company (hereinafter Amoco), completed the P.L. Lawrence No. 2 Well in Crowley, Louisiana. The Louisiana Department of Conservation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Fawvor v. US Oil of Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Guidroz v. TauzinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Bailey v. Franks Petroleum, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v. IP Petroleum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Broussard v. Union Pacific Resources Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001