Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 2, 1988No. 86-814Published

1Per curiam

Where the State fails to disclose to the defendant’s counsel, in response to a request for discovery, the existence of an oral inculpatory statement made at the time of arrest, which the state then uses at trial, the court is obligated to conduct an inquiry, at trial, pursuant to the mandates of Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971). From such inquiry it should be determined whether the discovery violation prevented the defendant from adequately preparing for trial. Because that determination cannot be made post-trial, Smith v. State, 500 So.2d 125 (Fla.1986), it follows that it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Borges v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API