Legal Opinion
Borges v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 27, 1984No. 84-350PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
459 So.2d 459 (1984)
Raul BORGES, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 84-350.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
November 27, 1984.
Gold & Fox and Myron M. Gold, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Renee E. Ruska, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
Even if, arguendo, it can be said that a hearing pursuant to Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla. 1971), was required when it appeared that the State had not produced for the defendant's examination and inspection an item of physical evidence, the existence, location and…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Bowling v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
4Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Grant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Howard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988