Legal Opinion

United States v. Jordan

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 20, 1991No. Crim. 90-295-01 (CRR)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(d), the defendant moves this Court to set aside his guilty plea to the charge of possessing with intent to distribute 5 or more grams of a mixture or substance containing detectable amounts of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(B)(iii). The defendant makes two claims in support of the motion: (1) the plea lacks a consensual basis because the prosecutor breached a promise to allow the defendant to cooperate with the government so that he could qualify for a sentencing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
  2. United States v. JordanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API