Legal Opinion

Dyno Nobel Inc v. MS & R Equipment Co Inc

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided May 8, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01782Unknown

1Opinion

Q IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DYNO NOBEL INC., ] ] Plaintiff, ] ] v. ] 2:19-cv-01782-ACA ] MS & R EQUIPMENT CO., INC., et al., ] ] Defendants. ] MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is Plaintiff Dyno Nobel, Inc.’s motion to dismiss three of the claims made in the amended counterclaim filed by Defendants MS & R Equipment, Co. Inc.” (“MSR”) and Cedar Lake Mining, Inc. (“Cedar Lake”). (Doc. 25). Dyno Nobel filed its complaint in diversity against MSR and Cedar Lake, alleging that they failed to pay for goods they had…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. James Edward Hoefling, Jr. v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. Larry D. Butler v. Sheriff of Palm Beach CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API