Legal Opinion

Bates Manufacturing Company v. Franklin Company

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 25, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff Bates Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Bates) sought and obtained a judgment forever barring certain restrictions on the Triangle Lot, so-called, as a cloud on title. Of the three defendants only Franklin Company (hereinafter called Franklin) appeals.

The facts are not in dispute. By indenture in 1862 Franklin conveyed to Andro-scoggin Mills, predecessor in title to Bates, the Triangle Lot, so-called, being part of a larger lot, in Lewiston, subject to the following restriction:

“ * * * that so much of the said lot as is southerly of said street…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McArthur v. Hood Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  2. Caron v. MargolinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
  3. Hill v. OgrodnikSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1955
  4. Town of Narragansett v. KennellySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1955

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Knight v. KnightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Friedlander v. Hiram Ricker & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Friedlander v. Hiram Ricker & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API