Bates Manufacturing Company v. Franklin Company
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.
The plaintiff Bates Manufacturing Company (hereinafter called Bates) sought and obtained a judgment forever barring certain restrictions on the Triangle Lot, so-called, as a cloud on title. Of the three defendants only Franklin Company (hereinafter called Franklin) appeals.
The facts are not in dispute. By indenture in 1862 Franklin conveyed to Andro-scoggin Mills, predecessor in title to Bates, the Triangle Lot, so-called, being part of a larger lot, in Lewiston, subject to the following restriction:
“ * * * that so much of the said lot as is southerly of said street…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McArthur v. Hood Rubber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Caron v. MargolinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Hill v. OgrodnikSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1955
- Town of Narragansett v. KennellySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knight v. KnightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Friedlander v. Hiram Ricker & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Friedlander v. Hiram Ricker & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984