Plutka v. Salzanik
Baltimore City Court
1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.
As no evidence was offered tending to show that the mother knew her child had left his express wagon on the pavement, where it was a source of danger to passersby, I will grant the motion for a new trial; without expressing an opinion upon the mother’s liability, vel non, if such evidence were offered.
In discussing a parent’s liability for a child’s tort, the Court of Appeals, in Whitelock vs. Dennis, 139 Md. 560, Boyd, C. J., held:
“It is a broad general rule in the law of torts that a parent is not liable for the wrongful acts of his children, whether they are minors or adults. In order to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Whitelock v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
- Palm v. IvorsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
- Klapproth v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912