Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Campbell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 1910No. Civ. No. 693PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Yolo County, denying partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. E. E. Gaddis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

G. Wyatt Wheeler and John W. Wheeler filed their petition for a partial distribution of the above-entitled estate, claiming to be sons of Basil Campbell, deceased, by his wife, Mary Stephens, alleging that “the only other heir of said deceased is his surviving wife, Mary Jane Campbell”; it is also alleged that the last will of deceased has been lately admitted to probate and the said Mary Jane Campbell duly appointed executrix thereof. The petition was opposed by the executrix in her official capacity and by her individually and by Leonora Williams, devisee and legatee under said will,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Cebrian v. De LaveagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
  4. State v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Kilburn v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Wray's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Estate of WinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. McMillan v. GreerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Walker v. TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API