Legal Opinion

Cebrian v. De Laveaga

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1904No. S.F. No. 3588PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a decree of final distribution of "the residue of the estate" of José Vicente de Laveaga, deceased. The appeal is taken by Maria Josefa Cebrian, Maria C. de Laveaga, and Miguel A. de Laveaga, who were, respectively, the two sisters and the brother of said decedent. The said decree distributed said "residue" of said estate among said three appellants and the respondent Anselmo J.M. de Laveaga. The appeal is not taken from the whole of said decree, but only in so far as it adjudges that the respondent Anselmo J.M. de Laveaga is entitled to one-fourth part of said "residue"…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Murphy v. RamseySupreme Court of the United States · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Estate of GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API