Legal Opinion

Christ v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 2009No. ED 92123PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, Judge.

Michael and Leslie Christ (“plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“MSD”). Plaintiffs argue the trial court erroneously required evidence of elements of notice and duty in plaintiffs’ inverse condemnation action. In addition, plaintiffs claim the trial court erroneously ruled that the undisputed facts showed heavy rain caused the alleged inverse condemnation. Finding no error, we affirm

Plaintiffs filed a petition against MSD alleging inverse condemnation, nuisance, and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Fletcher v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Byrom v. Little Blue Valley Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Blue Springs v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  5. Basham v. City of CubaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rader Family Ltd. Partnership v. City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. McGinnis v. Northland Ready Mix, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Miller v. City of WentzvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Brown v. Seven Trails Investors, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Daniel Kruse, and Sharon Kruse v. Seven Trails Investors, LLC, and Madison Apartment Group, LP, Defendants/Respondents.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API