State Ex Rel. Cooper v. French
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1DissentPopovich, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent. Precedent establishes the refusal to rent real property to an unmarried woman because she would be *12living with her fiance is a prima facie violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act’s (MHRA) prohibition of marital status discrimination. I believe the majority misconstrues legislative history, public policy and the facts presented to reach a result contrary to this court’s interpretation of the MHRA.
I
The Minnesota Human Rights Act provides in relevant part:
It is an unfair discriminatory practice: (1) For an owner, lessee * * *(a) to refuse to sell, rent, or lease * * *…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.