Smith v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Craig,
Claimant Jerome Smith appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, which held that claimant was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(e), 43 P.S. §802(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law,1 because his discharge from Leech, Inc. was precipitated by an act of willful misconduct.
The referee and board, resolving conflicting testimony, found that claimant requested and received permission from his employer to leave work three hours early to tend to an “emergency at home.” Later in the day claimant telephoned his employer and told him that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lipfert v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Dunlap v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Miokovic Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Zelonis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wilder & Miller, P.C. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Melomed v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Simonds v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Walkowsky v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Diachenko v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.