Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2762 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Craig,

Claimant Jerome Smith appeals from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, which held that claimant was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(e), 43 P.S. §802(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law,1 because his discharge from Leech, Inc. was precipitated by an act of willful misconduct.

The referee and board, resolving conflicting testimony, found that claimant requested and received permission from his employer to leave work three hours early to tend to an “emergency at home.” Later in the day claimant telephoned his employer and told him that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lipfert v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Dunlap v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Miokovic Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Zelonis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilder & Miller, P.C. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Melomed v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Simonds v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Walkowsky v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Diachenko v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API