Stokes v. Norwich Taxi, LLC
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This amended appeal and cross appeal 1 require us to consider, inter alia, under what circumstances, in a case in which it already has been determined that an employee is entitled to unpaid overtime pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (act), the overtime premium rate may be calculated based on the fluctuating workweek method, as set forth in § 778.114 of title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 2 The defendants, Norwich Taxi, LLC (Nor wich Taxi), Susan E. Knowles and Harry F. Knowles, Jr., appeal from the judgment of the trial court,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Board of Selectmen v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Macdermid, Inc. v. LeonettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Singhaviroj v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Taylor v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.