Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Norwich Taxi, LLC

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 11, 2008No. SC 18059PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

This amended appeal and cross appeal 1 require us to consider, inter alia, under what circumstances, in a case in which it already has been determined that an employee is entitled to unpaid overtime pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (act), the overtime premium rate may be calculated based on the fluctuating workweek method, as set forth in § 778.114 of title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations. 2 The defendants, Norwich Taxi, LLC (Nor wich Taxi), Susan E. Knowles and Harry F. Knowles, Jr., appeal from the judgment of the trial court,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Janice Adcock-Ladd v. Secretary of Treasury United States Secret Service Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Board of Selectmen v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Macdermid, Inc. v. LeonettiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. Singhaviroj v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Taylor v. KingConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. State v. ReedConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API