Legal Opinion

Stever v. Torrent

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Bill to compel the specific performance of a land contract, and for an accounting. Complainant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Defendants, Torrent and Petrie, became interested in a land deal, wherein the former, upon information furnished by the latter, purchased, for $769,000, certain tracts of pine timber, under an arrangement that Petrie was to have a share of the profits. Effect was given to this arrangement in- a suit between them, reported in 88 Mich. 43. All of the tracts were sold, except one, called the “ Kalkaska Tract,” leaving the profits — to a *69portion of which Petrie was entitled — to be made from the disposition of this parcel. A contract was made between Torrent and a concern called the Smith Lumber…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Petrie v. TorrentMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API