Henzel v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
HUBBART, Chief Judge.
The central issue presented for review is whether a trial court’s alleged failure to recall accurately certain testimony prior to rendering a verdict in a non-jury criminal trial constitutes a legally sufficient ground to set aside a subsequently entered criminal conviction and sentence on a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We hold that such an alleged failure to recall testimony cannot constitute a valid ground for coram nobis relief. We accordingly, deny the petitioner’s original application filed in this court for permission to file a petition for a writ of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hallman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Lamb v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tafero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- State v. MorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989