Legal Opinion

Henzel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 4, 1980No. 77-2631PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUBBART, Chief Judge.

The central issue presented for review is whether a trial court’s alleged failure to recall accurately certain testimony prior to rendering a verdict in a non-jury criminal trial constitutes a legally sufficient ground to set aside a subsequently entered criminal conviction and sentence on a petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We hold that such an alleged failure to recall testimony cannot constitute a valid ground for coram nobis relief. We accordingly, deny the petitioner’s original application filed in this court for permission to file a petition for a writ of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hallman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Lamb v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Russ v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1926

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tafero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. State v. MorrisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API