Legal Opinion

United States v. Ross

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 11, 2007No. 07-1215PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

William Ross challenges his • 78-month sentence for his role in a conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine and marijuana. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). Because it appears from the record that the district court improperly applied a presumption of reasonableness for a within-guidelines sentence, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

Ross, along with 16 codefendants, was indicted for a drug conspiracy that began in 1995 and lasted until 2003. Two days before trial he pleaded guilty to the conspiracy charge (a second count was dropped, although the parties insist that there…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Robert MykytiukCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Karl CunninghamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Lavell DeanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. VallarCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. GuillenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API