United States v. Mendoza
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
A jury found José Mendoza guilty of distributing amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Mendoza challenges the sufficiency of the government’s evidence against him and the district court’s procedure for identifying alternate jurors. He also argues that the district court erroneously presumed that a sentence within the guidelines range would be reasonable. We affirm.
I
The evidence presented by the government, viewed in the light most favorable to it, demonstrated the following: In early 2004 the head of the drug unit of the Goshen, Indiana Police Department…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- United States v. Villegas-MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. AljabariCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. IrbyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. GaytanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.