Emerson Electric Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Berglund & Johnson and Daniel W. Johnson for Real Parties in Interest.
1Dissent
KENNARD, J., Dissenting.
At issue in this case is whether a witness at a deposition may be compelled to reenact an event relevant to the litigation. The majority holds that a deposition witness who refuses to reenact an event “fails to answer any question” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025, subd. (o)) and therefore may be compelled to perform the reenactment.
I disagree. The Legislature has specified in detail the procedures by which parties to a lawsuit may seek discovery, yet has made no provision for compelling deposition witnesses to reenact events. Unlike the majority, I would not upset the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.