Legal Opinion · Dissent

Emerson Electric Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1997No. S057119Published

Berglund & Johnson and Daniel W. Johnson for Real Parties in Interest.

1Dissent

KENNARD, J., Dissenting.

At issue in this case is whether a witness at a deposition may be compelled to reenact an event relevant to the litigation. The majority holds that a deposition witness who refuses to reenact an event “fails to answer any question” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2025, subd. (o)) and therefore may be compelled to perform the reenactment.

I disagree. The Legislature has specified in detail the procedures by which parties to a lawsuit may seek discovery, yet has made no provision for compelling deposition witnesses to reenact events. Unlike the majority, I would not upset the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dyer v. MacDougallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Bailey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API