York v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 8, 1924:
Doerfler, J.
By its answer to the first question of the special verdict the jury found that the defendant failed to exercise ordinary care in putting the cinder dump on which York was riding in use with the accumulation of frozen cinders .on the platform at the back end of the car. De*115fendant’s counsel claim that, conceding the condition of such platform as above described, it must be held as a matter of law that their client was free from negligence; that it would be unreasonable and impracticable to require the company to malee periodical…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Jacobs v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BerkshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Swoboda v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Nadau v. White River Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Owens v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Papagni v. PurdueNevada Supreme Court · 1958