Rapp v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Fuchsberg, J. (dissenting).
During the course of the departmental and Grand Jury investigations which preceded his dismissal, petitioner applied posthaste for a service retirement pension (Administrative Code of the City of New York, § B336.3, subd h, par [4]). However, completion of the hearings resulted in dismissal taking place two days before the retirement could have been effective. As a result, the Board of Trustees of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System thereupon denied the application on the ground that petitioner, then no longer "in city service”, was not a member of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. Little, Brown & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- In re the Arbitration between Sentry Insurance & AmselNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Matter of Giannettino v. McGoldrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Rogers v. . DeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hoyt v. County of BroomeNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.