State v. Byrd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Chief Judge.
Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in denying defense counsel’s motion to sequester witnesses at the probable cause hearing. We find no error. Generally, the trial judge has discretion regarding sequestration of witnesses and his decision is reviewable only upon a showing of abuse of discretion. State v. Royal, 300 N.C. 515, 268 S.E. 2d 517 (1980). This rule applies regardless of whether the motion to sequester is made at trial or at the probable cause hearing. See G.S. 15A-611 (official commentary); G.S. 15A-1225. The fact that the prosecution witnesses…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Geders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- United States v. VannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. VannCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011